Feed on
Posts
Comments

As I was driving home today, it occurred to me that there must be thousands of other cars that I come across in a day but none of them really stand out.   There’s traffic in my lane, oncoming traffic and traffic down the side streets that I pay little attention to.   There is a car that is ideally suited for anyone.   Some of them are safe, reliable, good on gas, roomy, etc.   But they just seem to blend in.   Of course, there is that occasional car that is bellowing thick, black smoke or the one that plays music at a dangerously loud level.   I even saw a car that was on fire once.   Literally, on fire as it was driving down the road.   These are the few cars that stand out in the crowd, the ones that are obnoxious or simply noxious.

I compare this to the people that we meet in our lives and the ones we choose to date.  I hear women complain that they can’t seem to find a good guy.  Heck, that’s like finding a good car, they are everywhere.   But the good guys are the ones who will get passed up because they blend into the crowd.   They get stuck in the “Friend zone”, overlooked and taken for granted because they are safe and reliable.

You don’t really think too much about your car as long a it starts and gets you where you are going.   If it catches on fire or leaves you stranded you’ll be thinking about it all day.  The same goes for people.   When I started my own business, years ago, a friend told me, “Make a customer happy and they might tell three people about you.   Make a customer unhappy and they are certain to tell a dozen or more people about you.”   I believe this to be true, bad news travels fast and people get more passionate about negative feelings than good ones.

It’s as if something that is dangerous or toxic triggers some instinctual safety mechanism and creates a more powerful memory.   So, really, the most memorable people in our lives are the ones who were most toxic.   And many of us don’t seem to be able to get beyond this with our logic.   There may be some instinct associated with women wanting a “bad boy” because he appears to be the alpha male but I wonder if there is simply more to it than that.   I wonder if we are programmed to recognize danger as a powerful emotion and place more emphasis on it as we commit it to memory.

That may have been great, in less civilized times, when we faced real dangers.   Now, however, it seems to be having a paradoxical effect on us and actually drawing some people towards danger.   It makes us feel excited and alive but is it really what is best for us in the long run?

Photo credit: dantada from morguefile.com

Bookmark and Share

On a Personal Note…

There’s been quite a bit of debate on this blog about the merits of intentional dating versus getting to know people organically.  I’m sure you all know where I come down by now, but I’m aware that our strongly held beliefs and our actual experiences don’t actually match up.  For instance, I have a couple of friends who are big proponents of online dating and can offer a long list of reasons that online dating services are the best way to meet people…but both of them engage actively in online dating and don’t ever seem to form a good or lasting relationship.  In fact, I hear a lot of complaints.

With that in mind, I started thinking specifically about how I’ve met the men in my life–the good ones and the ones I would have been better off without.  Of course, I’ve never met a man through a dating service, so I can’t offer up a comparison.  But I can tell you where the most significant men in my life have come from, and I think it’s very telling.

I met my husband at a friend’s house.  I met my ex-fiance playing league darts.  I’ve met other good men (many of whom are still in my life) at work, working on political campaigns, and registering people to vote.  As I said, I’ve never met anyone through a dating service, but I have met men at parties and in bars.  Hasn’t every woman?  And I’ve sometimes agreed when a man asked for my telephone number after a chance meeting in a public place.  Not one time in 25+ years has one of those “pick-ups” led to anything beyond a first date…and it’s often a painful first date that really reinforces all of the reasons that I’d rather get to know someone naturally.

Maybe it truly is different for different people.   But the people I know who swear by what I think of as catalog dating don’t seem to have much in the way of data to support the idea that it works. So what’s your story?  Where have you met the most significant men/women in your life?  What’s most successful, not just for meeting people but for finding kindred spirits and forming relationships?

Bookmark and Share

So, you find yourself attracted to someone and you want to make you feelings known.  But how do you do that without being insulting?  I’m not talking about just a sexual attraction.  I mean, for whatever reason, you find yourself drawn to someone.  It could be from something they said, the way they smile or their moral views.  Something about this person is drawing your attention like a magnet and, if you don’t say something, you will never know what could have been.

What you say, to make initial contact, is critically important.  Apparently you really do only get  one chance to make a first impression.  Tiffany compares this to being hit in the head with a 2X4.  Personally, I don’t hold grudges.  If someone accidentally hit me in the head with a 2X4 I would take the time to realize whether they know the proper way to handle a 2X4.

Is calling someone “sexy” the verbal equivalent of hitting them with a 2X4? Possibly. I mean, there are a lot of sexual harassment cases in our courtrooms. But why does that come across as being an insult rather than a compliment? This may be one of those simple differences between men and women. I think most men would love to hear a woman tell them that they are “sexy”. I certainly wouldn’t sue someone for calling me “sexy”. Honestly, for the life of me, I don’t know why a woman would take offense to being called “sexy”

Now let’s face reality here.  People want to be attractive and get noticed.  Look around you and you will see that there are businesses that thrive on this notion.  The popularity of laser hair removal, cosmetics, cosmetic surgery and tanning booths is sending a very clear message of vanity.  So, is it insulting to let someone know that they are attractive?  It shouldn’t be.  Since when did it become and insult to let someone know that they are what others aspire to?

Bookmark and Share

Not even for employees.  Mike’s recent analogy between interviewing for a prospective business partner or employee and “interviewing” for a prospective life partner is apt.  Unfortunately, it overlooks one very important point:  interviewing doesn’t work.  You know that I don’t believe interview-style dating works, but now I’m going one step further.  Traditional interviewing doesn’t work even as a means of forming successful business relationships.

The great irony is that as more and more people are deciding that traditional routes of meeting people are too difficult or too slow and adopting the interview-style shortcut of personal ads, dating services and the like, employers are waking up to the fact that the old-fashioned interviewing process doesn’t work even in the workplace.   High profile employment experts and recruitment specialists like Chicago’s Ed Ryan are showing businesses how to avoid the high costs of traditional interviewing and hiring processes.   And the costs are high:  studies show that on average, a “bad hire” costs the company about three times his salary.  That, too, is right in line with making a bad relationship choices.

The reasons the interview process fails are similar, too:  the “interviewer” gets focused on the wrong traits, the “interviewer” works to see what he or she wants to see, and the “interviewer” unwittingly feeds the right answers to the prospect.  The first point is the best possible argument for throwing out the wish list.  Most of us, it turns out, populate our wish lists with things that aren’t really important.  In the employment context, this is typically specific experience.  In the dating world, it may vary from person to person.  The bottom line is the same, though:  it isn’t the cold, hard data that makes a person compatible, in the workplace or in our lives.  Stop and think about your best relationship, about what made it really great.  You didn’t just say “she really loved dogs” or “he was an outdoor person!”, did you?

Our second downfall is giving too much benefit of the doubt.  Of course, writing off everyone who is imperfect in some way would mean writing off everyone, but there’s a difference between accepting imperfections and turning a blind eye to them.  Whether we’re interviewing to fill a job or dating as part of a quest for a romantic partner, we want to fill the position.  We want the person sitting across the desk (or table) to be “right”.  Maybe he had a great resume.  Maybe she makes us laugh.  Maybe he’s just really good looking.  For whatever reason, we’re not screening so much as we are (consciously or not) working toward making it work.  Often, that means glossing over the red flags and putting the most positive possible spin on what we do hear.  And that’s a decision that can cost a bundle.  It costs us in dollars, productivity, time and employee morale in the office; it costs in most of those same areas in our personal lives.  Bad relationships take a toll, especially when we’re unwilling to see them for what they are early on.

Finally, we give away the answers.  In the employment context, a good interviewer can avoid this once he’s conscious of it.  On a date, the interview is mutual, so it’s much more difficult.  It’s hard to be yourself and share information about yourself without simultaneously telegraphing what you want to hear from the person sitting across from you.  In a job interview, elaboration by the interviewer is like handing out a cheat sheet at the door, but on a date you can’t make the other person do all the substantive talking–and you shouldn’t.  The best you can do is try to overcome the “glossing over” and really hear it when that lovely lady sitting across from you is simply parroting back a concept you just fed her.

At least, that’s the best you can do if you’re scanning resumes (in the form of dating profiles) and interviewing for a life partner.  You might be able to do better with a better system, just like employers are finding that they can.

Bookmark and Share

If I wanted to expand my construction business by taking on a partner who wanted to do the same type of work and had a similar business philosophy, the most efficient way to do that would be to interview candidates.  The best way to find candidates would be to place an ad in the paper or possibly online.

Of course, I could find potential business partners “Organically” at the grocery store or bowling alley but that would probably take a lot longer.  The bottom line  is that people who are looking for work, check the want ads to find employers who might have similar interests.

With online dating, the same principle applies.  I’m not suggesting that finding a partner in life is like finding an employee.  I’m just saying that, if meeting someone “organically” isn’t working out, it’s nice top have an alternative.  Let’s face it, I’m not going to live forever and meeting someone “organically” takes a little longer.

I would prefer to meet someone the “old fashioned” way like all of the classic storybooks but that’s just not practical in todays world.  I don’t like this but the fact is that most people are very busy and dating becomes more of a job interview than a natural event.  One of the most common sentences that I have seen on womens dating profiles is, “Don’t waste my time” of you don’t meet certain requirements.

So, Tiffany, while you may find that meeting people organically works best for you, there are many women who find it a complete waste of time.  At least, if the people don’t meet their requirements.

Bookmark and Share

Results Matter

“It’s the thought that counts”? Really, Mike?  That seems to be what you’re saying.  But in the end, isn’t it really the outcome that counts?  If someone hits you in the head with a 2 x 4 on a  job site, your injury is going to be the same whether it was intentional or accidental.  Sure, your reaction to the person who did it may be different, including your willingness to work with him again, but in the end, is it really the intent that matters?  If the guy is just an honest clutz and every time you work with him, he injures you, are you going to keep on working with him and getting injured just because he didn’t mean any harm?

Or, let’s take away the actual injury.  Imagine that you meet a woman who constantly makes loud, annoying, inappropriate jokes.  You know her intent is to be funny…but does that make you enjoy her jokes more?   Does it make you enjoy her company more?  Does the unfunny and annoying become amusing? Or is a bad joke a bad joke, regardless of the motivation behind it?

Sure, if you know someone means well, you can cut him or her some slack.  You can decide not to hold it against him.  You can opt not to sue because he whacked you in the head with a 2 x 4.  But in the end, intent doesn’t impact the bottom line at all:  a guy who keeps cracking your skull with a 2 x 4 isn’t someone you want to keep standing next to.  Asking him to explain isn’t going to change that.

Bookmark and Share

If you want to know, ask

I don’t think that we will ever agree on whether,  “Your sexy babie” is a compliment or not.  I think the key factor for me is intent and I’m sure that it was intended as a compliment.  A better approach may have been for this guy to tell you specifically what he found attractive about you but he may not have been able to put it into words, the French call that “Je ne sais qoi”.  It’s funny how much better that sounds than “I don’t know what” but it’s a great example of having something get lost in the translation.  Which, seems to happen often with male and female communications.

Now, rather than taking this as an insult, you could ask him what he found attractive about you.  You may be pleasantly surprised by his answer.  I doubt it but I am trying to be optimistic here and you may have simply misunderstood what he meant by that.

Marriage counselors use a technique called “Mirroring” to avoid misunderstandings and improve communications. For those who don’t know, mirroring, is basically telling the other person how you interpreted what they said before you start judging them and acting on that judgment. See, I think that the road to hell is paved with misunderstandings. It seems easier to make pavement than it is to clear things up and mirroring is all about not jumping to conclusions.

If you are interested in someone enough to let them know that you find them attractive, you should be interested enough to be specific as to why.  My focus is simply on creating good communications from the onset of any relationship.  And what better way to do that than talk about how you feel and why?

Bookmark and Share

Advice about constructing an “effective” online dating profile abounds on the Internet, and the concept leaves me scratching my head just a bit.  So does the pervasive idea that “everyone” posts only his or her best pictures.  I strongly suspect that I’m in the minority on this one, but I can’t see the upside in luring someone into a first date where he’ll find that we’re not really compatible, or be disappointed because I only looked like my profile picture for five minutes seven years ago in the Glamour Shots studio.  Then again, I don’t even “spin” on a job interview.  I figure if who I’m going to be every day isn’t right for the place, we might as well all find out up front.  So what do you think?  Is your profile a way to put yourself out there and see who responds, or an opportunity to present something a little better than reality and set the hook?

Online Dating Profiles: Best Pictures or Broad Representation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Bookmark and Share

Picky or Sane?

Anyone who has a “wish list” for a potential partner is asking for trouble.  I’ve said before that I think the biggest problem with “finding love” in today’s society is that we try to shop for mates like we shop for a new dress or a juicy grapefruit.  Looking for love, in my book, is  a big mistake and one that rarely leads to anything positive or lasting.  Relationships, as I’ve said before, are best formed organically, and you can’t interview for a soul mate.  I’m all for keeping an open mind, for getting to know people even if they don’t look like your perfect life partner at a glance.  I think people come into our lives for many reasons, and might be worth getting to know even if we’re never going to date them.  I also think people can surprise us, and that the guy you were sure you’d never “think of that way” just might turn out to be the love of your life.

But there’s a big difference, a critical difference, between keeping an open mind and ignoring reality.

If you choose not to go out with a guy because he’s a hard core football fan and you’re not into sports, you just might be a little too picky–and you might be cheating yourself out of what could have been a good relationship.  You might even be cheating yourself out of a new interest that you never anticipated.  But if you choose not to go out with a guy because he’s an alcoholic, or because he has a history of abusing the women in his life, you’re not being picky. You’re not focusing on a “wish list”.  You’re just being rational.

Somehow, it’s become blurry.  People talk about “red flags” when they mean inconveniences, things that would take some getting used to.  It’s a “red flag” if a guy has a second drink at dinner or if the toilet seat is up in his apartment or if he wants to make plans a week in advance when you’re more of a spontaneous person.  Those aren’t red flags.  They’re just differences–differences that you may or may not be able to tolerate, work around, even ultimately embrace.   People who see red flags everywhere miss out on a lot. But the flipside is worse. The flipside ignores genuine, vibrant, rapidly fluttering red flags under the guise of keeping an open mind or throwing out the wish list.

A while back, Mike wrote about crossing off rules one by one in an attempt to force a relationship to work (or to avoid admitting that it wasn’t going to).  Then, he presented it as a bad thing, as part of his ongoing downfall in relationships.  Now, he’s telling us that throwing out the wish list is the way to go.  And he’s right on both counts.  The key is knowing what’s a wish and what’s a rule.  Long blonde hair, for example, is a wish.  Sanity is a rule.

Bookmark and Share

Throwing out the wish list

I’ll never forget the day that my lawyer friend came to help me on a construction project I was doing.  He was completely out of his element but also willing to learn and a very quick study.  It was a good experience for him and I’m sure he got more exercise than he normally does at the gym.  I don’t think he will give up his day job to become a construction worker but he did get a glimpse of what it would be like.  It was a new experience for him but it wasn’t a comfortable situation to be so far out of  his element.

This is what I was referring to when I said that I wouldn’t know how to be in a healthy relationship.  A relationship that is actually building something rather than resolving issues of previous relationships (like a divorce lawyer does).   I’m not saying that I wouldn’t be up for it, or wouldn’t quit my day job of finding toxic relationships.  It would just be awkward and uncomfortable for me, at first, not to have to “fix” somebody.

Recognizing that I have a tendency to get into unhealthy relationships is not enough to change that pattern.  I would have to know what a healthy relationship looks like if I wanted to find one.  This is where having expectations or a “Wish list” becomes very limiting.  By clinging to the idea that I know what I want, I might miss out on something I never even knew existed.  Hey, I didn’t know I liked sushi until I tried it.

So, now it is more a matter of knowing what I don’t want.  That’s a more clear list to understand because it is all the things that I have experienced.  I know I don’t like okra because I’ve tried it.  It’s amusing how many people will say, “That’s because you haven’t tried MY okra”.  Look, it’s okra whether you fry it, boil it, bread it or blend it into a milkshake it’s still on my list of things I do NOT want.

As far as not being alone for five minutes is concerned, I’ve been alone for five years.  Just because I can be alone doesn’t mean I should be or want to be.   And I don’t see anything wrong with tossing out the wish list and trying some new relationships.  How can I possibly know if a relationship will work or not unless I bother to take the time to find out?  At the very least, I may learn a few more things that I like or dislike.

Bookmark and Share

Older Posts »